THE ADA ‑ YOUR
RESPONSIBILITIES AS AN EMPLOYER
A. What
is Reasonable Accommodation?
Employers must make
reasonable accommodation to the physical or mental limitations of an otherwise
qualified individual with a disability as defined by the ADA, unless the
employer can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship.[1]
The employer's obligation to make reasonable accommodation is limited by the
employer's knowledge of the existence and extent of the employee's disability.
Some examples of reasonable accommodation are job restructuring (modifying a
job so that a person with a disability can perform the essential functions of
his/her job), modifying equipment, modifying the employee's work schedule, or
allowing the employee to take leave.
Along with the employee, the
employer bears responsibility for determining what accommodation is necessary.[2]
Both the employer and the employee must participate in good faith in this
interactive process. The employer is not required to offer the accommodation
that is preferred by the employee, so long as the accommodation that is offered
by the employer is reasonable. The employer is not required to create a new
position or to offer transfer to a position where there is no current or
impending vacancy in order to accommodate the employee. Also, the employer does
not have to retain or accommodate potentially violent employees.[3]
Steps
Toward Identifying a Reasonable Accommodation[4]
(1)
Determine the purpose and essential functions of the
particular;
(2)
Consult with the employee and ascertain his/her precise
job‑related limitations imposed by her disability and how those
limitations may be overcome with a reasonable accommodation;
(3)
While consulting with the employee, identify potential
accommodations and assess the effectiveness each would have in enabling the
employee to perform the essential functions of the position;
(4)
Consider the employee's preference and select and
implement the accommodation that is most appropriate for both the employee and
his/her employer.
If there is a claim against
the employer for failing to reasonably accommodate a disabled employee, the
employee bears the burden of showing that reasonable accommodation was
available.[5]
The employer bears the burden of showing that a proposed accommodation would
cause undue hardship, excusing the employer from adopting that accommodation.
If the employer presents evidence that the employee cannot perform the job,
even with a reasonable accommodation, the employee must produce evidence
"concerning his/her individual capabilities and suggestions for possible
accommodations to rebut the employer's evidence." [6]
B. When is
Accommodation an Undue Hardship?
The ADA defines undue
hardship as an action which would require significant difficulty or expense to
the employer when considered in light of the following factors[7]:
(1)
the nature and cost of the accommodation needed;
(2)
the overall financial resources of the facility or
facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodation;
(3)
the number of persons employed at the facility;
(4)
the effect on expenses and resources, or the impact
otherwise of such accommodation upon the operation of the facilities;
(5)
the overall financial resources of the covered entity;
(6)
the overall size of the business of a covered entity
with respect to the number of its employees;
(7)
the number, type, and location of its facilities;
(8)
the type of operation or operations of the covered
entity;
(9)
the composition, structure, and functions of the work
force of such entity;
(10)
the geographic separateness; and
(11)
the administrative or fiscal relationship of the
facility or facilities to the covered entity.
The EEOC defines undue
hardship as any action that is unduly costly, extensive, or substantial to the
particular employer or would fundamentally alter the nature of operation of the
business.[8]
If a particular accommodation
causes an undue hardship, but there are other accommodations available which do
not create an undue hardship, then an employer will be required to provide the
alternative remedy.
C. Alcoholism,
Drug Use and Emotional Disorders: Hot Topics under ADA
The ADA has identified
alcoholism as a disability. Denial of employment solely on the basis of prior
alcoholism is prohibited by the ADA.[9]
However, if an employee exhibits destructive behavior or violates company
policy due to symptoms of his/her alcoholism, he/she may be, terminated for
that behavior.[10] Courts seem
to recognize a distinction between terminating an employee for a disability and
terminating an employee for misconduct. Factors considered in making
termination decisions include risk to supervisors and other employees,
reputation of the employer, violation of company policy, and violation of
criminal laws.
Some courts have ruled that
termination based solely on behavior causally related to an employee's
alcoholism, such as excessive absenteeism, constitutes removing the employee on
the basis of his/her disability, reasoning that the manifestations of the
disability cannot be distinguished from the disability itself.[11]
The ADA itself, however, does not appear to support this approach.
If an employer does not know
about an employee's disability, then the employer cannot be held accountable
for failing to accommodate that employee. In the case of alcoholic employees,
most courts find that if an employee is terminated due to alcohol‑related
misconduct, that behavior alone is not sufficient to impute knowledge of the
employee's disability to the employer.[12]
Employers may implement
policies that prohibit the consumption of alcohol at the workplace, and may
require employees not to be under the influence of alcohol at the workplace.[13]
The employer may have the same employment and job performance standards for
alcoholic employees as for other employees.
D. EEOC Guidance on
Return to Work and ADA
The EEOC is responsible for
enforcing Title I of the ADA. In addition, the EEOC provides guidance on
interpreting the ADA and implementing ADA policy in the workplace. The EEOC
issues handbooks, compliance manuals, and other guidance documents. The EEOC
also hosts technical assistance and training programs throughout the country
for employers and employees in the private sector, state and local government,
and the federal government.
Web sites:
http://www.eeoc.gov
http://www.hrzone.com/topics/ada/ada.html
http://www.dinf.orq/ada/ada_ta1_eeoc.html
http://www.adaptenv.org/infodocs/infodoc.htm
http://www.thompson.com/tpg/person/able/able.html
[1] Zamudio v. Patla, 956 F.Supp. 803 (N.D.111. 1997).
[2] Zamudio v. Patla, 956 F.Supp. 803 (N.D.111. 1997).
[3] Palmer v. Circuit Court o Cook Co., 117 F.3d 351 (7' Cir. 1997).
[4] ?
[5] Wojchiechowski v. Emergency Technical Services, 1997 WL 164004 (N.D.111.).
[6] Erjavac v. Holy Family, 13 F.Supp.2d 737 (N.D.Ill. 1998).
[7] ADA
[8] Kathleen M. Holper and Patrice S. Arend, Balancing Alcoholic's Rights and Employer Liability Under Anti‑Discrimination Laws, 86 111. B.J. 148‑150.
[9] EEOC
[10] Little v. FBI, 1 F.3d 255 (4" Cir. 1993), Maddox v. University of Tennessee, 62 F.3d 843 (6th Cir. 1995), Altman v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 903 F.Supp. 503 (S.D.N.Y. 1995).
[11] Teahan v. Metro‑North Commuter Railroad, 951 F.2d 511 (2d Cir. 1991), Despears v. Milwaukee County, 63 F.3d 635 (7th Cir. 1995).
[12] Larson v. Koch Refining Co., 920 F.Supp. 1000 (D.Minn. 1996), Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Leary v. Dalton, 47 F.3d 928 (7" Cir. 1995), Schmidt v. Safeway, Inc., 864 F.Supp. 991 (D.Or. 1994), Despears v. Milwaukee County, 63 F.3d 635 (7' Cir. 1995).
[13] Littler, Fundamentals of Employment Law.